Re[3]: [CEDET-devel] New lexer in

[Eric M. L. <er...@si...>]

>>> ry...@ds... seems to think that:
>Hi Eric,
>
>I missed changing "depth" to "semantic-lex-maximum-depth", because I
>blindly looked for "maximum-depth" in my code to replace with
>"semantic-lex-maximum-depth" instead of "depth".  For every
>semantic-lex-XXX that you mentioned in your email, I looked for XXX to
>replace.

Oh, did I mess mentioning some variables in my email?  I apologize.

>I fixed it.  Also I managed to get rid of all warnings except one
>reference to "end".  I need to know the end point especially when
>re-parsing due to EXPANDFULL so that proper number of DEDENT tokens
>can be generated when the end point is reached.  If not the "end" free
>variable, what else can I use to detect that the cursor is at the end
>of region currently being parsed?
  [ ... ]

The `start' and `end' variables are still there, but it is better to
use the new state variable which is created like this:

	    ;; Bounds needed for unterminated syntax
	    (semantic-lex-analysis-bounds (cons start end))

Thus, you can replace `end' with (cdr semantic-lex-analysis-bounds).
When protecting against unterminated syntax, you can use the
`semantic-lex-unterminated-syntax-protection' macro which hides
that.  I don't know if that is appropriate for your INDENT/DETEND loop
or not, but if you have your match-code throw an error, it would work.

Good Luck
Eric

-- 
          Eric Ludlam:                 za...@gn..., er...@si...
   Home: http://www.ludlam.net            Siege: www.siege-engine.com
Emacs: http://cedet.sourceforge.net               GNU: www.gnu.org