Re: [Cdk-devel] Code Refactoring

[Rajarshi G. <rx...@ps...>]

On Sat, 2006-06-03 at 18:33 +0200, Kai Hartmann wrote:

> I think Rajarshi (as qa leader) would be the obvious choice. As a part-
> of-a-part-time cdk developer, I gladly step back.

I can take it on - but I can't promise too much time over the next month
or two - though I don't think this is a very time intensive project

> Maybe we can collect a list of no more than 10 "Dos and Don'ts" that
> address the most important coding conventions we all can agree on (a
> temporary wiki page would be nice for collecting). I don't think a long
> document is a good way to get into this - because nobody will read it...
> but I didn't find a good example in the web.

Agreed

> About the coding style settings in IDEs: I think this could be useful.

I can export my IDEA settings and put them on the wiki

> Are there so
> many people eager to join the cdk channel but are prevented from doing
> so by firewalls? ;)

Me :(

> *My* major concern and the issue that brought me into this is a
> consistent and constant API, at least for the kernel classes, in the
> very near future. 

I agree - this has bitten me and is biting me :)

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Rajarshi Guha <rx...@ps...> <http://jijo.cjb.net>
GPG Fingerprint: 0CCA 8EE2 2EEB 25E2 AB04 06F7 1BB9 E634 9B87 56EE
-------------------------------------------------------------------
COBOL is for morons.
-- E.W. Dijkstra