From: Egon W. <eg...@sc...> - 2002-08-23 14:22:17
|
On Friday 23 August 2002 15:17, Christoph Steinbeck wrote: > Egon Willighagen wrote: > > for the IUPAC name generator I am in need of off the shell structures... > > Templates that is... I am going to make a template dir containing > > structures of many kinds in the future... > > > > Does it make sense to make this package cdk.templates, or should I make > > it cdk.iupac.templates? > > How will these templates be coded? Hard coded in by small > MoleculeFactory-like code fragements, or will in a chemical file format? > The first version might be faster. Yes, I was planning to do that hard coded... like you did for some tests... > In any case, we might need templates/fragments in more than one place. > Maybe org.openscience.cdk.templates.iupac? Does that make sense? There is not much specific IUPAC about that, other than that it is used for the iupac generator, and probably a future IUPAC parser too... I would say, either cdk.templates then... I will be using subdires, like ringsystems, aminoacids, etc... Egon |