From: Egon W. <ego...@gm...> - 2012-04-15 07:57:48
|
Hi all, currently, if patches do net get reviewed in three months, there will be a one-week last notice, after which the patch goes in unreviewed... mostly things get reviewed in time, at least to some extend. But sometimes they don't. Right now, there is a patch from Nov 2011 which did not get reviewed, which I'll try to rebase now. What I like to propose here, is to reduce this time to 6 weeks (keeping the required one-week last notice), so that things do not linger on too long. Good or bad? Egon -- Dr E.L. Willighagen Postdoctoral Researcher Department of Bioinformatics - BiGCaT Maastricht University (http://www.bigcat.unimaas.nl/) Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers |