From: Константин Т. <an...@ya...> - 2010-05-02 11:11:22
|
В Sun, 02 May 2010 12:59:57 +0200 Christoph Steinbeck <ste...@eb...> пишет: > We need to be careful with statements about what "should be possible" > until we've done it. :-) > The overall size of 4MB is the sum of all things, many of which are > only loaded on demand. > What counts is the size of the *initial* load, which needs to be fast > (560KB at the moment), and the size of each of the chunks which are > loaded on demand. They also need to be small. > The 4MB are never loaded at once. > > I'm more than happy to finance a little workshop here at the EBI or > in Uppsala to work on a scheme to make the applet very small. Be > aware, however, that *always* we rely on modules of the CDK which > come in jars of a given size and determine the size of the > load-on-demand-chunks I mentioned above. I can propose a little idea on applet size. You are using yguard to shrink jars, but it also can obfuscate code. It has an option to replace all non-API functions with names of minimal possible length. This approach can save also a bit of space in applet. > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > On 01/05/2010 21:57, Angel Herráez wrote: > > On 1 May 2010 at 21:20, Egon Willighagen wrote: > > > >> However, with the current design, a sub 250kB applet should be > >> possible... > > > > That's interesting... Right now, just applet-core and applet-editor > > sum up 560 KB > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > > Cdk-jchempaint mailing list > > Cdk...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdk-jchempaint > -- Regards, Konstantin |