From: Rajarshi G. <rg...@in...> - 2009-01-13 13:20:53
|
On Jan 13, 2009, at 2:51 AM, Egon Willighagen wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Rajarshi Guha <rg...@in...> > wrote: >> Hi, I seem to recall that the CDK policy was to do just enough and no >> more. In that vein why does the SMILES parser perform atom typing, h >> addition and aromaticity perception in the parseSmiles method? > > The SMILES parser is indeed somewhat diverging from the general > scheme... if not mistaken, this was decided on the last in the past > year... it should have been recorded as RFC... now I can only point > the the ML archived :( Aah, OK - should be a wiki page BTW, would it be OK to make the private parseSmiles method public (possibly renamed) so that we can access the parsed-only molecule? ------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajarshi Guha <rg...@in...> GPG Fingerprint: D070 5427 CC5B 7938 929C DD13 66A1 922C 51E7 9E84 ------------------------------------------------------------------- A red sign on the door of a physics professor: 'If this sign is blue, you're going too fast.' |