From: Rajarshi G. <rg...@in...> - 2007-10-23 16:47:53
|
On Oct 23, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Egon Willighagen wrote: >> 2. The non-JJTree SMARTS parser. Given that the JJTree parser has >> fewer bugs, etc, it makes sense to remove the other parser. This >> would also make the SMARTS package cleaner - currently it's confusing >> to see two parsers in similar paths > > Ummm... this might actually deserve a full separate email... is there > nothing in the other version left that is not dealt with the JJTree > version? At least from the point of view of bugs smiles.smarts.SmartsParser.jj - 85 Junit failures (in ParserTest.java) smiles.smarts.parser.SmartsParser.jjt - 2 Junit failures (in RecursiveTest.java and the two failures are due to H addition/ aromaticity perception issues and 0 in ParserTest.java) I don't think the non-JJTree parser handles recursive SMARTS - I may be wrong ------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajarshi Guha <rg...@in...> GPG Fingerprint: 0CCA 8EE2 2EEB 25E2 AB04 06F7 1BB9 E634 9B87 56EE ------------------------------------------------------------------- Science kind of takes the fun out of the portent business. -Hobbes |