From: Jon P. <jo...@re...> - 2008-08-20 03:37:21
|
Ok, know towards end of August...what is latest % near completion? We have admin docs fleshed out, and I'm about ready to install ccHost 5.0 on test ocal and openfontlibrary... VS, what are you thinking on timeline for launch? I think we should just push out with goal like sept 15 and lock and load. Jon -- Jon Phillips San Francisco, CA + Guangzhou + Beijing GLOBAL +1.415.830.3884 CHINA +86.1.360.282.8624 jo...@re... http://www.rejon.org IM/skype: kidproto Jabber: re...@gr... IRC: re...@ir... |
From: Victor S. <fou...@gm...> - 2008-08-20 03:46:43
|
Sept. 15 sounds good to me. Greg did a great job fleshing out "new install" bugs and kicking off the admin docs. Unfortunately he did not get to the 'make' file and I'm sure it's still useless. Personally I think make could/should be nothing more than: svn export . ../release zip cchost5.zip ../release (plus whatever needs to happen for int'l. I don't have a clue what state the Int'l stuff is in) VS On 8/19/08, Jon Phillips <jo...@re...> wrote: > Ok, know towards end of August...what is latest % near completion? > > We have admin docs fleshed out, and I'm about ready to install ccHost > 5.0 on test ocal and openfontlibrary... > > VS, what are you thinking on timeline for launch? I think we should just > push out with goal like sept 15 and lock and load. > > Jon > > -- > Jon Phillips > San Francisco, CA + Guangzhou + Beijing > GLOBAL +1.415.830.3884 > CHINA +86.1.360.282.8624 > jo...@re... > http://www.rejon.org > IM/skype: kidproto > Jabber: re...@gr... > IRC: re...@ir... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Cctools-cchost mailing list > Cct...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cctools-cchost > |
From: Jon P. <jo...@re...> - 2008-08-20 04:31:04
|
Ok, my priorities for release: 1. install onto big installations * ocal + oflb and work with folks there to flesh out bugs 2. test make file, document that mofo 3. test language and document that Jon 4.0 out On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 20:46 -0700, Victor Stone wrote: > Sept. 15 sounds good to me. Greg did a great job fleshing out "new > install" bugs and kicking off the admin docs. Unfortunately he did not > get to the 'make' file and I'm sure it's still useless. > > Personally I think make could/should be nothing more than: > > svn export . ../release > zip cchost5.zip ../release > > (plus whatever needs to happen for int'l. I don't have a clue what > state the Int'l stuff is in) > > > VS > > On 8/19/08, Jon Phillips <jo...@re...> wrote: > > Ok, know towards end of August...what is latest % near completion? > > > > We have admin docs fleshed out, and I'm about ready to install ccHost > > 5.0 on test ocal and openfontlibrary... > > > > VS, what are you thinking on timeline for launch? I think we should just > > push out with goal like sept 15 and lock and load. > > > > Jon > > > > -- > > Jon Phillips > > San Francisco, CA + Guangzhou + Beijing > > GLOBAL +1.415.830.3884 > > CHINA +86.1.360.282.8624 > > jo...@re... > > http://www.rejon.org > > IM/skype: kidproto > > Jabber: re...@gr... > > IRC: re...@ir... > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge > > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > > prizes > > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Cctools-cchost mailing list > > Cct...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cctools-cchost > > -- Jon Phillips San Francisco, CA + Guangzhou + Beijing GLOBAL +1.415.830.3884 CHINA +86.1.360.282.8624 jo...@re... http://www.rejon.org IM/skype: kidproto Jabber: re...@gr... IRC: re...@ir... |
From: Dave C. <da...@la...> - 2008-10-02 09:34:20
|
2008/8/20 Victor Stone <fou...@gm...>: > > Sept. 15 sounds good to me. What is the status? |
From: Victor S. <fou...@gm...> - 2008-10-02 12:17:54
|
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Dave Crossland <da...@la...> wrote: > 2008/8/20 Victor Stone <fou...@gm...>: >> >> Sept. 15 sounds good to me. > > What is the status? > We missed the 15th ;) Status is: we are going ahead with a 5.0 release that doesn't have full int'l support and no 'make' facility and is thin on docs, hopefully by this time next week. VS |
From: Jon P. <jo...@re...> - 2008-10-02 15:39:01
|
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 13:54 +0200, Victor Stone wrote: > On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Dave Crossland <da...@la...> wrote: > > 2008/8/20 Victor Stone <fou...@gm...>: > >> > >> Sept. 15 sounds good to me. > > > > What is the status? > > > > We missed the 15th ;) Status is: we are going ahead with a 5.0 release > that doesn't have full int'l support and no 'make' facility and is > thin on docs, hopefully by this time next week. Actually, I have some time starting Sat to look at this...I want to look at the above, move OFLB and OCAL over to the 5 code prior to the release and look at that towards the end of next week, early week after... Is that kosher with all? Jon > > VS -- Jon Phillips San Francisco, CA + Guangzhou + Beijing GLOBAL +1.415.830.3884 CHINA +86.1.360.282.8624 jo...@re... http://www.rejon.org IM/skype: kidproto Jabber: re...@gr... IRC: re...@ir... |
From: Victor S. <fou...@gm...> - 2008-10-02 15:44:18
|
That's fine with me, like I've said, now (as in: the next few weeks) is a good time for me to help out with transitional stuff. Point me at v4 code and I can suggest strategies for porting. VS On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Jon Phillips <jo...@re...> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 13:54 +0200, Victor Stone wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Dave Crossland <da...@la...> wrote: >> > 2008/8/20 Victor Stone <fou...@gm...>: >> >> >> >> Sept. 15 sounds good to me. >> > >> > What is the status? >> > >> >> We missed the 15th ;) Status is: we are going ahead with a 5.0 release >> that doesn't have full int'l support and no 'make' facility and is >> thin on docs, hopefully by this time next week. > > Actually, I have some time starting Sat to look at this...I want to look > at the above, move OFLB and OCAL over to the 5 code prior to the release > and look at that towards the end of next week, early week after... > > Is that kosher with all? > > Jon > >> >> VS > -- > Jon Phillips > San Francisco, CA + Guangzhou + Beijing > GLOBAL +1.415.830.3884 > CHINA +86.1.360.282.8624 > jo...@re... > http://www.rejon.org > IM/skype: kidproto > Jabber: re...@gr... > IRC: re...@ir... > > |
From: Dave C. <da...@la...> - 2008-10-02 16:56:14
|
2008/10/2 Jon Phillips <jo...@re...>: >> >> We missed the 15th ;) Status is: we are going ahead with a 5.0 release >> that doesn't have full int'l support and no 'make' facility and is >> thin on docs, hopefully by this time next week. That's okay with me, although the lack of documentation is a major concern, and then the int'l support, and then the 'make' facility (I don't know what you mean by that, although I can guess) > Actually, I have some time starting Sat to look at this...I want to look > at the above, move OFLB and OCAL over to the 5 code prior to the release > and look at that towards the end of next week, early week after... Ben Weiner is handling OFLB; please email him about this :-) |
From: Victor S. <fou...@gm...> - 2008-10-02 16:59:21
|
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Dave Crossland <da...@la...> wrote: > 2008/10/2 Jon Phillips <jo...@re...>: >>> >>> We missed the 15th ;) Status is: we are going ahead with a 5.0 release >>> that doesn't have full int'l support and no 'make' facility and is >>> thin on docs, hopefully by this time next week. > > That's okay with me, although the lack of documentation is a major > concern, and then the int'l support, and then the 'make' facility (I > don't know what you mean by that, although I can guess) regarding major concern: admin docs or dev docs - please don't say both - I can a major dent in one or the other for this release. My sense is that admin docs are more important... VS |
From: Dave C. <da...@la...> - 2008-10-02 17:06:41
|
2008/10/2 Victor Stone <fou...@gm...>: > > regarding major concern: admin docs or dev docs - please don't say > both - I can a major dent in one or the other for this release. My > sense is that admin docs are more important... I've organised hiring Ben Weiner to work full time on OFLB for one month; his job is chiefly making a fresh ccHost v5 deployment, making a totally customised skin, and making minor code alterations to make the system work appropriately for fonts instead of music files. I would say that therefore admin docs would be more suitable, but since Ben spent the last 2 days looking at ccHost 5, I defer to him. Ben? :-) |
From: Victor S. <fou...@gm...> - 2008-10-02 18:29:23
|
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Dave Crossland <da...@la...> wrote: > I would say that therefore admin docs would be more suitable, but > since Ben spent the last 2 days looking at ccHost 5, I defer to him. > The admin were started a while ago here (very incomplete I would say): http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CcHost5Documentation But I *highly* recommend all folks (devs, admins, skin makers) getting familiar with the new Content Manager http://wiki.creativecommons.org/CcHost5Documentation/Content_manager We've gone to zero HTML/XML hacking on ccHost since this has been in place. VS |
From: Ben W. <be...@re...> - 2008-10-02 18:50:33
|
Hi, Dave Crossland wrote: > 2008/10/2 Victor Stone <fou...@gm...>: > >> regarding major concern: admin docs or dev docs - please don't say >> both - I can a major dent in one or the other for this release. My >> sense is that admin docs are more important... >> > > I would say that therefore admin docs would be more suitable, but > since Ben spent the last 2 days looking at ccHost 5, I defer to him. > I would appreciate that, yes. The v5 docs are a revelation - I can't really tell why I didn't spot them, but that's too bad and I have them now! Cheers, Ben |
From: Victor S. <fou...@gm...> - 2008-10-02 20:10:05
|
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Ben Weiner <be...@re...> wrote: >> I would say that therefore admin docs would be more suitable, but >> since Ben spent the last 2 days looking at ccHost 5, I defer to him. >> > > I would appreciate that, yes. The v5 docs are a revelation - I can't really > tell why I didn't spot them, but that's too bad and I have them now! please, please ask if you get stuck. VS |