From: Gary K. <gw...@me...> - 2008-09-24 03:13:51
|
HI Robert, I don't know and it doesn't seem to return a non-nil value for any of the many systems I just checked. My reading of the code appears to be saying something like: the input files of X, are either the output files of all the self- dependencies or X's pathname. It also seems to me that direct-dependencies would be a better name than self-dependencies. > Also, am I correct in thinking that component-depends-on is a > candidate > for having its standard method combination replaced by append? Or > would > that be a mistake? I think so, yes. HTH, On Sep 23, 2008, at 3:38 PM, Robert Goldman wrote: > Does anyone have a clear understanding of the role of this function, > and > its relationship to component-depends-on? Examination suggests that > the > coder considered the possibility that component-depends-on would > overgenerate, returning some dependencies that actually didn't match > the > component, and these dependencies would be weeded out by > component-self-dependencies. Is that correct? > > Anyone know why component-self-dependencies is a generic function? > It's > internal, so I assume that the ASDF extender is not expected to extend > this generic function. > > If someone can clue me in, I will try to write up a documentation > string > that can be inserted into the source.... > > > thanks, > r > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win > great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in > the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > cclan-list mailing list > ccl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclan-list -- Gary Warren King, metabang.com Cell: (413) 559 8738 Fax: (206) 338-4052 gwkkwg on Skype * garethsan on AIM |