From: Daniel B. <da...@te...> - 2002-06-21 21:56:59
|
Rahul Jain <ra...@ri...> writes: > Miles Egan <mi...@ca...> writes: > >> One more question. Would it be helpful to add a "supported >> distribution" property to asdf? I know a few of the packages I've >> worked on only work in sbcl or cmucl. Maybe we should make this >> explicit? > > I think that could be handled by :depends-on ((:feature :cmu)) or > whatever the syntax is in the defsystem, no? yup. Look at test/test3.asd for an example. That uses the longer-winded :in-order-to syntax that depends-on expands to, but it should be clear anyway. -dan -- http://ww.telent.net/cliki/ - Link farm for free CL-on-Unix resources |