Re: arglist-intro sometimes missing

[Alan M. <ac...@mu...>]

Hello, John.

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:15:32AM -0500, John Yates wrote:
> (Fumble fingered earlier and sent an incomplete report.)

> void foo(  // topmost-intro
>   int a,   // arglist-intro
>   int b)   // arglist-cont
> {}

> void foo(  // topmost-intro
>   int a    // arglist-intro
>   , int b  // arglist-cont
>   )        // arglist-close
> {}

> void foo   // topmost-intro
>   ( int a  // topmost-intro-cont (?)
>   , int b  // arglist-cont   <==============================
>   )        // arglist-close
> {}

> /john

That (?) line looks fine to me.  There isn't an arglist-intro, as such,
and the line does continue the topmost-intro.  The real question is why
does it bother you.  What do you want to do?

I'm a bit surprised the the line I've marked is an arglist-cont rather
than arglist-cont-nonempty.  It may be to do with the comma being at the
beginning of that line rather than the end of the previous line.

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).