[brlcad-users] What is the general functional stability of g-stl?
Open Source Solid Modeling CAD
Brought to you by:
brlcad
From: O. B. <kof...@gm...> - 2009-08-09 16:23:57
|
Hello, I find BRL-CAD to be just the tool I need for my 3D modelling. But I need to export my models to STL and for that I am using the g-stl utility. I am on Windows XP with version 7.12.6. I have a question with regards to the g-stl and its functional stability. I have had some problems with it myself: 1. I takes way too long with small relative and absolute tolerances (parameters -r, -a, and -n). 2. It can suddenly crash in the middle of exporting. This usually happens if tolerences are low (0.001, 0.0001). What is the best way to use g-stl? I need som good SLS/SLA prints of my model. - Should one use combinations only, or should one use regions only? Does it matter? - Any other good ideas for the boolean-structure of the models in the .g file? Is there some configurations that always will slow it down? - Can such combinations/regions contain other regions (would it represent a possible exporting issue if they do)? - Can somebody explain or recommend on the use of the arguments -D, -r, -a, and -n? The extra arguments for setting tolerances seem necessary, since too few triangles will be created otherwise. - What is the functional stability of g-stl? Is it working, is it buggy, should and can I rely on it for exporting my MGED database files? - Is there anything to be gained by using BRL-CAD+g-stl on linux instead on windows? Regards, Ole Buus |