Re: [Bmf-user] Use clarification.

[Andy B. <am...@br...>]

Thus said Tom Marshall on Sun, 22 Dec 2002 15:43:59 PST:

> The -p option is unrelated to the mode (see "bmf -h"). If you use "bmf
> -p", the effect is identical to "bmf  -n -p" or "bmf -s -p", depending
> on how the email is scored.

Right, but doesn't  any email that goes through bmf  change the database
regardless of whether or  not -s or -n is used? I  don't think I phrased
my question just right. :-) What I mean is that if an email goes through
bmf, whether  with -p  or without, it  will be flagged  as spam  or not.
Since it was flagged, did it also update the entries in the database? If
so, then I would  need to rerun the email through bmf with  the -S or -N
switches, depending on the situation, right?

Just to clarify what I mean, if  it isn't already clear, I have a .qmail
file with

| bmf -p | maildir ./Maildir/

If an  email arrives, and is  not flagged as  spam, but it really  is, I
should then take that email and run it through ``bmf -S''.

Andy
--
GnuPG ID 0xA63888C9 (D2DA 68C9 BB2B 26B4 8204  2219 A43E F450 A638 88C9)
[-----------[system uptime]--------------------------------------------]
  6:23pm  up 204 days,  2:43,  1 user,  load average: 1.00, 1.00, 1.00