Re: [Bastille-linux-discuss] Red Hat version numbers and names

[<Zie...@re...>]

So you guys approve?  If so what will be the next step?  Also, let me know what you guys decide on the defaults.  I vote (if it matters) for no defaults.

Ziemowit Pierzycki
Development Engineer
Reuters America Inc.



                                                                                                                                              
                    Jay Beale <ja...@ba...>                                                                                        
                    Sent by:                                       To:      Ziemowit Pierzycki/OAK/US/Reuters@REUTERS                         
                    bas...@li...urc       cc:      bas...@li...                      
                    eforge.net                                     Subject:      Re: [Bastille-linux-discuss] Red Hat version numbers and     
                                                                    names                                                                     
                                                                                                                                              
                    03/23/2003 11:49 PM                            Header:                                Internal Use Only                   
                                                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                              




This looks good.

 - Jay

In the wise words of Zie...@re...:

>
> There are some more modifications I made:
>
> API.pm:
>
> Replaced code around lines 378:
>
>         elsif ( -e "/etc/redhat-release" ) {
>             open(*REDHAT_RELEASE,"/etc/redhat-release");
>             $release = <REDHAT_RELEASE>;
>             my %version;
>             if ($release =~ /^Red Hat Linux .*\((.*)\).*/) {
>                 %version = ('Psyhe'=>'RH8.0',
>                          'Valhalla'=>'RH7.3',
>                         'Pensacola'=>'RHAS2.1',
>                            'Enigma'=>'RH7.2',
>                           'Seawolf'=>'RH7.1',
>                          'Guinness'=>'RH7.0',
>                              'Zoot'=>'RH6.2');
>             }
>             unless ($distro = $version{$1}) {
>                 print STDERR "Couldn't determine Red Hat version! Setting to 6.2!\n";
>                 $distro = 'RH6.2';  # I would get rid of defaults
>             }
>             close(REDHAT_RELEASE);
>         }
>
> Added RHAS2.1 flag around line 483:
>
> sub get_supported_OS_list () {
>   my @list = ( "DB2.2", "DB3.0",
>            "RH6.0","RH6.1","RH6.2","RH7.0","RH7.1","RH7.2","RH7.3","RH8.0","RHAS2.1",
>            "MN6.0","MN6.1","MN7.0","MN7.1","MN7.2","MN8.0","MN8.1","MN8.2",
>            "HP-UX11.00","HP-UX11.11", "HP-UX11.22", "HP-UX11.23",
>            "SE7.2","SE7.3", "SE8.0","TB7.0" );
>   return \@list;
> }
>
> Added RHAS2.1 so it is excuted also:
>
> if (($distro eq 'RH7.2') or ($distro eq 'RHAS2.1')) {
>   $GLOBAL_FILE{"banners_makefile"}="/usr/share/doc/tcp_wrappers-7.6/Banners.Makefile";
> }
>
> IOLoader.pm:
>
> Added RHAS2.1 flag to line 267:
>
>          my $supported_versions = 'RH6.0 RH6.1 RH6.2 RH7.0 RH7.1 RH7.2 RHAS2.1 RH7.3 RH8.0';
>
> What are your thoughts?
>
> PS.  Yes I spelled Guinness correctly this time around.  Sorry.
>
> Ziemowit Pierzycki
> Development Engineer
> Reuters America Inc.
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>         Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
>
> Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more
> information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging
>
> Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
> sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
> the views of Reuters Ltd.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Does your code think in ink?
> You could win a Tablet PC. Get a free Tablet PC hat just for playing.
> What are you waiting for?
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?micr5043en
> _______________________________________________
> bastille-linux-discuss mailing list
> bas...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bastille-linux-discuss

--
Linux / Unix Security:  http://www.bastille-linux.org/jay
Key:  http://www.bastille-linux.org/jay/key.pub
Key fingerprint = A1C6 75B8 1BA6 B085 403B  631A 3248 7B65 090E B308
pub  1024D/090EB308 2002-02-12 Jay Beale (Not very secure key) <ja...@zo...>


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and
the chance of winning an Apple iPod:
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en
_______________________________________________
bastille-linux-discuss mailing list
bas...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bastille-linux-discuss






-----------------------------------------------------------------
        Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com

Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more
information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging

Any views expressed in this message are those of  the  individual
sender,  except  where  the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.