Re: [Bacula-devel] client-only install

[Kern S. <ke...@si...>]

On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 13:12, Dan Langille wrote:
> The client only install creates a file script named fd.  The full 
> install creates a file script named bacula.
> 
> I don't think we need fd any more.  The bacula script will start only 
> those binaries which are present on the machine.
> 
> In addition, fd does not cater for the -u or -g options on bacula-fd.

We can drop fd if no one uses it, but I do on all my FD only systems. On
those systems, I often have everything installed but use only the FD --
e.g. on my development machine where I build for my other machines.

> 
> I haven't tried this yet, but I'm just guessing that we should do 
> this.