Re: [Bacula-docs] PDF of book with some suggested structuring changes

[Jeremy C. R. <re...@re...>]

On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:

> I think that what I had previously noted about removing the bold around 
> filenames etc was not clear, because you did remove a number of "bold" thus 
> losing content.  As I mentioned, I have no problem change the bold to be a 
> macro or something so that you can eliminate it for the book.  However, 
> having certain fields clearly visible in the online version is important. 

I apologize about that. I misunderstood your email about that which said: 
"Note, I don't see any cases where you have unduly removed bold -- I just 
mention this as a consideration for other similar changes."

As far as I know I never made any more changes related to that after your 
email.

  To: bac...@li...
  Subject: Re: [Bacula-docs] editing manual
  Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:15:02 +0100
  Message-Id: <200...@si...>

> I would appreciate it if you would put back the bold, or as we discussed, 
> change it to a macro that can be set differently for each output type, or 
> simply find something that is acceptable for both online html and the book.
> 
> Clearly there could be several different contexts depending on how much 
> work one wants to do (i.e. filenames, program names, ...)  each could be 
> different if you want.

Okay.