From: Phil S. <ph...@ca...> - 2014-04-10 14:02:35
|
On 04/10/14 09:45, jon pounder wrote: > On 04/10/2014 09:39 AM, Jason A. Kates wrote: >> As they are worded more like slander than indisputable facts. They >> could be worded in a neutral manner, as they are listed it's far from >> neutral or strait facts. >> >> Equating this to a holocaust denier is also very very wrong. > > Given they are being sued for doing what they feel is right, how neutral > do you expect them to be ? Are you suggesting anyone can reasonably feel that it is "right" to copy, while under a signed non-disclosure agreement, the work of other people and remove all of the author attributions? In the academic and publishing world, that is called plagiarism. In business, it is called intellectual-property theft. -- Phil Stracchino Babylon Communications ph...@ca... ph...@co... Landline: 603.293.8485 |