From: <mar...@up...> - 2013-06-27 19:09:18
|
We just finished a large backup (6.63TB) to a mix of LTO3 and LTO4 tapes. The odd thing is that the job spanned 49(!) tapes: 46 LTO3 3 LTO4 Of those 49(!) tapes, running "query 14" (List Jobs stored for a given Volume name) for each tape in the job, I find: 2 LTO4 tapes are shown as containing only the large (6.63TB) job 42 LTO3 tapes are shown as containing only the large (6.63TB) job 1 LTO4 tape contains data from 2 jobs (part of the 6.63TB job and 7.78GB of data from another backup) 1 LTO3 tape contains data from 2 jobs (part of the 6.63TB job and 11.85GB from another job)) 1 LTO3 tape contains data from 3 jobs (part of the 6.63TB job and 382GB from another job and 11.93GB from another job) 1 LTO3 tape contains data from 2 jobs (part of the 6.63TB job and 19.93GB from another job)) I'm not using software compression. Hardware compression is enabled in the tape library. The SD is configured with a "Maximum File Size" of 5GB. I don't understand why so many tapes were used for this job. Even with random, uncompressible data, that media should be able to store over 18TB. Is it possible that tape shoe-shining is wasting that much media capacity? Can anyone suggest any ways to look into this further? Thanks, Mark |