From: Adrian R. <bac...@li...> - 2012-03-26 19:51:28
|
Hi Anton, On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 02:54:34PM +0400, Anton Nikiforov wrote: > Yes you are right about bacula dealing with files/tapes. > But my situation is differ. I have 4 storages with one device each. And > my problem is that bacula do not want to backup different clients to > different storages concurrently in case clients have less than 3 jobs > allowed. > I have no problem with storage. I have tested configurations with spool > and two drives per storage and it works fine. > But bacula still try to start concurrent jobs from one client. > The thing i need is bacula backing up multiple clients at the same time. > Not multiple jobs from the same client at the same time. I think I got you right, let me summarize your issue in my own words: - you have N clients - you have 4 different SDs (in 4 different locations) - each SD has 1 pool - each SD should backup each client as fast as possible - a single client should only run 1 single backup at a time - spooling is not enabled - if you reduce the 'Max Concurrent Jobs' on the FD to 1-2 the backups block each other as e.g. 1 job occupies the SD and waits for the FD while another occupies the FD and waits for the SD Obviously you actually want to block the FD, so you need to unblock the SD. You can achieve this by adding resources to the SD. The needed ressources are actually drives with media. These you can get by either - using vchanger with several drives - using different pools for each client per SD that use different drives Regards, Adrian -- LiHAS - Adrian Reyer - Hessenwiesenstraße 10 - D-70565 Stuttgart Fon: +49 (7 11) 78 28 50 90 - Fax: +49 (7 11) 78 28 50 91 Mail: li...@li... - Web: http://lihas.de Linux, Netzwerke, Consulting & Support - USt-ID: DE 227 816 626 Stuttgart |