From: Joseph L. C. <jc...@ac...> - 2011-12-26 02:48:53
|
>Hi and happy new year to every, I'm just wondering if it's possible to use Bacula with >PostgreSQL 9.1.x because I'm trying several ways and have not luck because it ask for > libpq.so.4. Which is not available at CentOS 6. >I tried to fake the repos enabling CentOS 5 but then get this other error: I can't imagine a good reason to do ever do that? While I use the provided Postgre packages the fact those packages are built for centos 6 but don’t provide their own non stock deps nor get them from any package in base is concerning. Last time I looked at the spec it was so long and unruly I wasn’t surprised they became impossible to maintain. >So, any help on this? Yes, I can only imagine the packages at that repo are built but not ever tested. If they are tested, the QA environment certainly does not represent a stock setup as you just found one of more issues with them. Now you will encounter other problems when you remove those packages, you'll end up needing to prevent the scripts section from executing as they likely won't work, then be forced to cleanup manually removing old init scripts and working directories etc. Install from a repo that is tested and does work, delete that repo file add the one from Simone Caronni at http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/epel-6/x86_64/ These packages do work well and the maintainer validates his builds and uses a more thorough build process. He's also responsive to suggestions from the list. Good luck, jlc |