From: Mark <bac...@ne...> - 2011-01-13 20:33:05
|
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Bart Swedrowski <ba...@ti...> wrote: > > I think what Lawrence meant was that say full backup takes 33GB, as > the one below. > > | 1,089 | tic FS | 2011-01-08 02:05:03 | B | F | > 464,798 | 33,390,404,320 | T | > > Now, if you do Incremental backup, it's going to be reported by > bconsole as even bigger, eg.: > > | 1,097 | tic FS | 2011-01-09 02:05:03 | B | I | > 6,573 | 39,758,701,241 | T | > | 1,105 | tic FS | 2011-01-10 02:05:08 | B | I | > 4,585 | 39,502,153,253 | T | > Have you done a 'list files jobid=<some job>' for one of your incrementals? Maybe you have a few really large files that are getting changed every day, and therefore getting backed up each day. I have no such behavior from bconsole, my incrementals show only the small amount of change that I'd expect: 273 Full 23,002 2.278 G OK 05-Jan-11 03:23 Backup-dev3 276 Incr 422 21.52 M OK 06-Jan-11 03:28 Backup-dev3 279 Incr 104 17.43 M OK 07-Jan-11 03:38 Backup-dev3 282 Incr 306 24.18 M OK 08-Jan-11 03:47 Backup-dev3 285 Incr 74 17.41 M OK 09-Jan-11 03:18 Backup-dev3 288 Incr 151 17.80 M OK 10-Jan-11 03:20 Backup-dev3 292 Incr 158 18.30 M OK 11-Jan-11 03:53 Backup-dev3 295 Diff 151 17.53 M OK 12-Jan-11 03:31 Backup-dev3 298 Incr 145 1.001 M OK 13-Jan-11 03:27 Backup-dev3 (the 'list jobs' output also shows the small numbers for incrementals, but the output of 'status client' fits into 80 columns better : ) |