From: Karl H. <hak...@ah...> - 2006-02-03 14:45:52
|
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 12:21:38PM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote: > Well, that is certainly some kind of record. I'm even surprised that Bacula > was able to handle so many files. This is a little unsettling. We have been testing bacula with a view to replacing our backup system with it. From some of the reading I have been doing, I did not think our site was particularly large. However, our testing is going very well and it looks like bacula is doing a better job than our current system and another commercial system that we tested a couple of years ago. -- Karl Hakimian hak...@ah... |