From: Les M. <les...@gm...> - 2011-04-19 15:31:03
|
On 4/19/2011 9:43 AM, Timothy J Massey wrote: > > > Everything appears to be working correctly. I can backup and restore > > with no errors. However, the performance is worse than atrocious and > > I can't believe everything is working > > I agree strongly with Adam. Most likely, your problem is not a BackupPC > issue, but an NFS issue. To determine this, do some performance testing > with dd. If you see the same issue there (and I think you will), you can > then start to debug your NFS issues. > > I also agree strongly with Adam: NFS and performance do *not* mix. I > have put much work into making NFS work with high performance for use as > a VMware datastore. All of my research led me to believe that it's just > not possible without using very high-end hardware with large > battery-backed cache. You might find my research helpful--at the very > least, it will show you how to perform the testing using dd. > > http://communities.vmware.com/thread/263165?start=0&tstart=0 > <http://communities.vmware.com/thread/263165?start=0&tstart=0> > > > Having said all of the above, the results you are seeing (*minutes* for > a webpage to display) do not seem like expected low-end performance, > they sound like something is *broken*. Yes, that doesn't seem right, unless perhaps it is while simultaneously writing backups. The easiest fix might be to rip the drives out of the badly-performing nfs server and put them in the linux box running backuppc. -- Les Mikesell les...@gm... |