Re: [BackupPC-users] Btrfs, hardlinks, and BackupPC...

[Mark P. <pot...@gm...>]

I to am far from a BackupPC expert.

I do not know if BackupPC test for the file system's hard link upper limit,
but do know that it tests for the lower limit (e.g. hard linking greater
than 1, i.e. file system support hard links).  However I do know that
BackupPC does support a configuration to set a hard link upper limit:

$Conf(HardLinkMax) = 31999;

Maximum number of hardlinks supported by the $TopDir file system that
BackupPC uses. Most linux or unix file systems should support at least 32000
hardlinks per file, or 64000 in other cases. If a pool file already has this
number of hardlinks, a new pool file is created so that new hardlinks can be
accommodated. This limit will only be hit if an identical file appears at
least this number of times across all the backups.


Mark Potter
----------


On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:34 AM, Ken D'Ambrosio <ke...@jo...> wrote:

> Hey, all.  I just did a quick search, and haven't noticed any hits on
> "btrfs" in the subject lines of any e-mail here.  Which makes me wonder if
> anyone has noticed it.  Btrfs only supports 256 (or is it 512?) hardlinks
> per directory; that's a hard-coded value that is unlikely to change, as it
> would require an on-disk format change.  I'm fairly certain that BackupPC
> will blow past that for a directory with lots of static entries, no?  If
> so, should BackupPC
> - Figure out if it's on a btrfs filesystem, and, if so,
>  - switch from hardlinks to COW "clones"?
>
> COW clones are a different mechanism entirely than a hardlink; however,
> insofar as BackupPC is concerned, I think they might well be considered
> identical.  It's my understanding that BackupPC only hardlinks static
> files that won't change; in this scenario, I believe a COW clone would
> work just the same.
>
> If there's a flaw in my logic, I'd deeply appreciate someone pointing it
> out -- I'm not claiming to be an expert in either BackupPC or btrfs, but
> believe I've outlined (correctly, even) the issues involved.
>
> If nobody else is interested, I'm willing to take a stab at this, though
> my spare cycles for the next month or two are asymptotically approaching
> 0.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Ken
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
> Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
> of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm
> _______________________________________________
> BackupPC-users mailing list
> Bac...@li...
> List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
> Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
> Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
>