From: Seemanta D. <see...@gm...> - 2011-09-12 18:55:23
|
I have used mercurial before and find it quite smooth and logical. I would stay away from centralized SCMs as much as possible. //Seemanta On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Paul Klapperich < pau...@pa...> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Rick Mann <rm...@la...> wrote: > >> >> We use Subversion at Yahoo! and I've never heard of a commit being >> corrupted. >> > > Nobody here had either until I tried to use hg-svn, which builds the > complete local history (as DVCSs like to have) by checking out each revision > one after another and committing them to mercurial. I was unable to due this > to a broken revision. We later found several others that were problematic. > > We do have several gigs of information in the repository and a thousand or > so commits, so I can't speak of how common/likely it is in more normal > source-code only repos such as this. > > -- Paul > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop > What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses > from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops > provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable > virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/ > _______________________________________________ > avarice-user mailing list > ava...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/avarice-user > > |