re[2]: [Aubit4gl-discuss] And this one

[Dominic S. <d....@qu...>]

Andrej,=20

Thanks for that one... - Afraid I have to start with pedants corner and point =
out that lines 3, 5 and 10 are formatted correctly (and to be particularly =
anal, I did run a diff against the output from I4gl) - only the smallint/int =
formatting is at fault.

Now, testing this with the v3 compiler, I found a perverse feature to this in =
that if you disable Informix emulation, the output is exactly as per Informix =
(In particular, it's the emualtion of Informix numeric handling which appears =
to be causing this - it makes a degree of sense, as it goes...).=20

> :1          :    <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> :1     :        <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> :1:            <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> :1 :
> :1         :    <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> :-1         :    <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> :-1    :        <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> :*:
> :-1:
> :-1        :    <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

> Dominic, btw; fglc hangs on long DBPATH; you might want to take a look at =
that
> too.

Does it make any difference (DBPATH) if you're running against SE/OnLine, and =
which version/platform are you hitting this on? Does trimming down DBPATH make =
a difference (ie, is it possible that we may be looking at some other issue?).




Dominic Smith (d....@qu...)
Technical Support Manager, Querix  (UK) Ltd.

+44 (0)23 80232345