From: Ville V. <vil...@gm...> - 2008-08-13 17:11:58
|
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Robert Dodier <rob...@ya...> wrote: > --- On Tue, 8/12/08, Daniel White <da...@wh...> wrote: >> How about considering a DVCS. DVCSs make it dead easy for >> anyone to contribute to. > -1 for DCVS. +1 for SVN. > I won't bother trying to explain; the issues are largely > religious on all sides anyway. Ok, I'll bite. The most important thing wrt choosing a VCS is that it is one that our maintainer (that would be Erik) is happy with. It's unlikely that abcl will have massive parallel branch development, so the possible shortcomings of SVN aren't likely to bite abcl development, nor are the benefits of a DVCS likely to be reaped. When there are more (much more) committers, this issue is maybe worth discussing again - in the meantime, SVN is fine. Just my 0.02. -VJV- |