Re: [Aprsd-devel] Re: APRSd stuff

[Brian D H. <bdh...@c4...>]

Hmm,

	I'm running 2.96 and I'm pretty sure Chuck is using the same (I'm
on RH7.0, Chuck's on RH7.1).  I don't think it makes a big difference.  GCC
3.0 was released a week or two ago.  I'm waiting for some more feedback on
it.  So far I'm hearing that its vastly improved for C++, but the C
compiler produces slightly less efficient code (on the sets tested) that
then 2.9[5-6] builds.

				THX/BDH
 
-- 
============================================================
Brian D Heaton               | I fear that we have awakened
Principal Consultant         | a sleeping giant and instilled
C4I2.com System Consultants  | in him a terrible resolve.
bdh...@c4...            | -- Admiral Isoruku Yamamoto
USA (719) 623-0381           | -- Imperial Japanese Navy
UK +44 (0)845 127-5400       | -- December 7, 1941

On 2001.07.02 03:09 Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 10:55:30PM -0600, Brian D Heaton wrote:
> > What version of G++ are you using?  I'm just curious as I think I got
> only
> > one warning on my last compile.
> 
> The version number of the Debian gcc package is "1:2.95.4-0.010629".
> I guess that means 2.95.4. I can't do a gcc --version right now.
> 
> On my production APRS machine, I have gcc 2.95.2, which gives
> even more warnings, including something about invalid types
> in ANSI C++.
> 
> Hamish
> -- 
> Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <ha...@de...> <ha...@cl...>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Aprsd-devel mailing list
> Apr...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aprsd-devel
>