From: Antoni M. <ant...@gm...> - 2008-11-27 12:14:04
|
2008/11/27 Bill Evans <bil...@gm...>: > Hello, > > I'm trying to get the distribution working, and am having two problems. > > Running Ubuntu 8.10. I downloaded aperture-1.2.0.tar.gz from sourceforge, and > extracted everything, including unzipping src.zip. > > FIRST PROBLEM: > In this pristine state, the tests report failure. In the middle of the output, > I get these lines: > $ant test > . . . > [junit] Nov 26, 2008 1:28:43 PM org.openrdf.rdf2go.RepositoryModel finalize > [junit] WARNING: org.openrdf.rdf2go.RepositoryModel not closed, closing now. > [junit] Tests run: 275, Failures: 4, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 37.841 sec > [junit] Error: > [junit] Nov 26, 2008 1:28:07 PM org.ontoware.rdf2go.RDF2Go checkModelFactory > . . . > the output continues, and I get this: > . . . > [junit] WARNING: org.openrdf.rdf2go.RepositoryModel not closed, closing now. > [junit] > [junit] Test org.semanticdesktop.aperture.TestAll FAILED > > BUILD FAILED > /home/bill/aperture-1.2.0/build.xml:701: Tests failed. > > Total time: 43 seconds > > But I can't find any output indicating *which* tests have failed. I can't find > any output at all, other than the lines on my screen. Where should I look for > the individual failures? And please confirm that I should expect *no* failures > on a pristine installation. The warnings that some RepositoryModels aren't closed are non-critical. The BUILD FAILED obviously is. Please write exactly what you did. I have downloaded the aperture-1.2.0.tar.gz under ubuntu 8.10 from SF myself, and typed tar -xzvf aperture-1.2.0.tar.gz cd aperture.1.2.0 unzip src.zip ant test and it ended with a build successful. > SECOND PROBLEM: > The OpendocumentExtractor omits a lot of the document (at least writer > documents). I opened an "artifact" regarding the bug: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=detail&aid=2352674&group_id=150969&atid=779500 > > I've written a fix that works for me, but I'm no ODF expert. Obviously, I want > to fully test the fix, but need the tests to work first! And I'd like to make > the tests more thorough, so that the original bug would have been caught. So, > any suggestions for the first problem would help my testing. And if someone can > discuss ODF, that would help me get the solution right. Great. Hope we'll find the problem. -- Antoni Myłka ant...@gm... |