Re: [Apertium-celtic] incorrect gender of word "targazh" in Breton dictionary

[Francis T. <ft...@pr...>]

El dg 18 de 03 de 2012 a les 11:40 +0100, en/na Dominique Pellé va
escriure:
> Fulup Jakez wrote:
> 
> > > D'ar/an 15/03/2012 22:18, Skrivet eo bet gant Dominique Pellé:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > The gender of word "targazh" is incorrect in the Breton Apertium dictionary:
> > >
> > > $ lt-expand apertium-br-fr.br.dix | egrep ^targazh:
> > > targazh:>:targazh<n><f><sg>
> > >
> > > It should be masculine:
> > >
> > > sure, fixed
> 
> Thanks, I confirm that this is fixed indeed now.
> 
> 
> > > http://www.agencebretagnepresse.com/cgi-bin/dico.cgi?dico=breton&key=targazh
> > >
> > > The words "saout" and "buoc’h" are also missing from the
> > > dictionary. They are very frequent words in Breton :-)
> >
> > yes, it was not missing but the paradigm was wrong.
> > I think I've fixed it now. We'll have to wait till the nex version
> > to see the changes online
> 
> That's not fixed yet somehow. I'm  using svn revision 36809 and
> I only see "buoc’h-Doue" and its mutations but not "buoc’h":
> 
> $ lt-expand apertium-br-fr/apertium-br-fr.br.dix | grep buoc’h
> buoc’h-Doue:>:buoc’h<n><f><sg>#-Doue
> buoc’hed-Doue:>:buoc’h<n><f><pl>#-Doue
> vuoc’h-Doue:>:buoc’h<n><f><sg>#-Doue
> vuoc’hed-Doue:>:buoc’h<n><f><pl>#-Doue
> puoc’h-Doue:>:buoc’h<n><f><sg>#-Doue
> puoc’hed-Doue:>:buoc’h<n><f><pl>#-Doue
> ~buoc’h-Doue:<:buoc’h<n><f><sg>#-Doue
> ~buoc’hed-Doue:<:buoc’h<n><f><pl>#-Doue
> buoc’h-Doue:>:buoc’h<n><f><sg>#-Doue
> buoc’hed-Doue:>:buoc’h<n><f><pl>#-Doue
> vuoc’h-Doue:>:buoc’h<n><f><sg>#-Doue
> vuoc’hed-Doue:>:buoc’h<n><f><pl>#-Doue
> puoc’h-Doue:>:buoc’h<n><f><sg>#-Doue
> puoc’hed-Doue:>:buoc’h<n><f><pl>#-Doue
> ~buoc’h-Doue:<:buoc’h<n><f><sg>#-Doue
> ~buoc’hed-Doue:<:buoc’h<n><f><pl>#-Doue
> 
> 
> buoc'h & saout used to be in the dictionary
> months ago (not sure when I last tried) so a
> regression happened here.

Le paradigme existe,

    <pardef n="/buoc’h__n">
          <e><par n="initial-b"/><p><l>uoc’h</l><r>uoc’h<s n="n"/><s
n="f"/><s n="sg"/></r></p></e>
          <e><p><l>saout</l><r>buoc’h<s n="n"/><s n="f"/><s
n="pl"/></r></p></e>
          <e r="LR"><par n="initial-b"/><p><l>uoc’hed</l><r>buoc’h<s
n="n"/><s n="f"/><s n="pl"/></r></p></e>
          <e r="LR"><par n="initial-b"/><p><l>uoc’henned</l><r>buoc’h<s
n="n"/><s n="f"/><s n="pl"/></r></p></e>
    </pardef>

mais je ne vois pas aucun mot dans le dico qu'utilise ce paradigme.

Fran