Re: [Aoetools-discuss] Licensing clarification
Brought to you by:
ecashin,
elcapitansam
From: Ed L. C. <ec...@co...> - 2007-08-16 15:20:20
|
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 10:01:19AM -0500, Jima wrote: > Hi folks. > I'm the maintainer of Fedora's aoetools and vblade packages. Fedora is > currently in the process of clarifying all of the package licenses to > (attempt to) ensure that there are no conflicts, particularly in regard to > GPLv2/GPLv3. > While I was auditing my packages, I noticed both aoetools and vblade only > have a COPYING file, with no copyright information within the actual > source (as instructed toward the end of the COPYING file). From the > information I've been given, that means clause 9 of the GPL takes over: > > "If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may > choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation." > > I'm not sure whether or not that's what you want. > So, do you have any preference on what version of the GPL covers your > source? > Thanks in advance. We should add copyright lines to the source files to be explicit, but the license version number seems like a separate issue. Anyway, I'm more interested in getting your perspective on the issue as a participant in the Fedora project. For example, is it easier for you if a software project adopts a specific GPL version? -- Ed L Cashin <ec...@co...> |