From: <gag...@ma...> - 2004-09-21 17:45:04
|
Le 04-09-21, =E0 13:24, Fish-face a =E9crit : > Yes, we have transparency, but really, you have to remember the=20 > contents of evPar, anyway - Well...we will have a documentation with a list of all postevents with=20= all the contents of epVar. It's easiest than ask people to go directly=20= into the code and try to find the name of the variable. > it wouldn't make much of a difference if the inner workings did=20 > change, and how often ARE the contents going to change? Like Arieh said, that's better to have something "permanant" who=20 does'nt depend on aMSN code. > > I've long been a stout defender of the no evPar front :) > > I originally thought that evPar was so that, if you didn't need=20 > feedback, you wouldn't have to upvar the variable. > > Incidentally, you don't need to upvar evPar, as you can pass it as an=20= > argument. The thing is, $evPar(nick) is pointless to me when its=20 > contents look like they're going to permanently be "nick." > > Not up to me, though! G-Rom eMail: gag...@ma... MSNMessenger: gag...@ho... iChat & AIM: gagnonje5000 (sur Mac.com) Skype: germinator5000 |