RE: [AMaViS-user] AVP Daemon question (fwd)

[Rainer L. <li...@su...>]

Hi folks!

FYI.

-- 
Rainer Link  |                SuSE - The Linux Experts
li...@su... |    Developer of A Mail Virus Scanner (amavis.org)
www.suse.de  | Founder OpenAntiVirus Project (www.openantivirus.org)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:32:58 +0300
From: Vyacheslav Medvedev <sl...@ka...>
To: 'Rainer Link' <li...@su...>
Subject: RE: [AMaViS-user] AVP Daemon question (fwd)

Dear Rainer

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 12:37:43 -0600
> From: Jeremy Fowler <je...@mi...>
> To: Amavis-User <ama...@li...>
> Subject: [AMaViS-user] AVP Daemon question
> 
> I've been playing around with automatically updating the bases with
> Kaspersky's AvpUpdater. After it downloads the latest bases, 
> does anyone know for sure if sending SIGHUP to the AVP Daemon will 
> reload the virus bases into memory? 
I think it is not need in common cases. Many users use updater on different
computer(from daemon). You can check return code and reload daemon.
> Does anyone know of a way to verify the new bases have been loaded?
Updater(after getting) and daemon(after loading) says: "Bases was loaded
correctly"/"bases didn't load" and return code. But! If we use SUGHUP you
don't have return code(you can see result in report-file only). I recommend
next actions: get from ftp/www, see result and then (if updater say "load
correctly") reload daemon

Today I have new version of updater with loading only different files.
 
> -Jeremy
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AMaViS-user mailing list
> AMa...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
>