Re: [AMaViS-user] Some questions about quarantining with 'sql:'

[Michael S. <mic...@se...>]

  On 9/29/10 8:42 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
> I haven't done any benchmarks in this regard. Quarantining is generally a
> quick operation in comparison to all the rest, so it should not matter
> much one way or another. Which one is faster probably depends much on
> a file system of choice, or on the database setup.
and consider that the database still has to write to the hard disk, and 
with filesystem, compression is easily implemented .
Our tests showed it faster to write, however:   unless you enable the 
sql logging, you don't have an easy way to search by subject 
line/sender/ recipient.

All depends on what you need.
(oh, and if a LOT of sql logging.  implement partitioning.)
-- 
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
ISN: 1259*1300
 > *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation

    * Certified SNORT Integrator
    * 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance
    * Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
    * Best in Email Security,2010: Network Products Guide
    * King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). 
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
______________________________________________________________________