From: Michael S. <mic...@se...> - 2010-08-23 16:17:24
|
On 8/23/10 11:46 AM, donovan jeffrey j wrote: > what is the best way to allow users to mark message as spam, and feed back to the content filter, aka redirect to junkmail/notjunkmail > i have this mail going to a folder and running an sa_learn i see the SpamAssassin Database Stats, and i see scores rising. eventually messages get their SPAM TAG > If your MTA is Exchange, it mungs the headers. If your users FWD the email, you lost even the munged headers (ie: yes, it is learning THEY are spammers) 'BEST' way to do it depends on a lot of things and assumptions. if using exchange < 2007 sp2, it supports imap reading of public folders. maybe use a imap program to pull the emails out (with the munged headers), search for imap+sa-learn if > 2007, sp2, you will need to implement EWS. (still gets you munged headers) maybe bcc to a filter that saves the original headers for a while, modify sa-learn imap program to replace the munged headers with a matching set you saved. maybe use amavisd clean arching for this. lots of options, lots of assumptions. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO o: 561-999-5000 d: 561-948-2259 ISN: 1259*1300 > *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation * Certified SNORT Integrator * 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance * Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness * Best in Email Security,2010: Network Products Guide * King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008 ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r). For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/ ______________________________________________________________________ |