Re: [AMaViS-user] Marc: use SPF to prevent backscatter?

[Michael S. <sch...@se...>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ama...@li...=20
> [mailto:ama...@li...] On Behalf=20
> Of Michael Scheidell
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 6:45 AM
> To: ama...@li...
> Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Marc: use SPF to prevent backscatter?
>=20
>=20
>=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ama...@li...
> > [mailto:ama...@li...] On Behalf=20
> > Of Mark Martinec
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 6:25 AM
> > To: ama...@li...
> > Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Marc: use SPF to prevent backscatter?
> >=20
> >=20
> > I find the extra 2.3 points for Windows XP,  1.3 for other
> > Windows, and -1 poins for Unix (non-Linux) quite valuable,=20
> > both for pushing the score over the limit for spam, or for=20
> > sparing a marginal ham on occasion.
> I thought (I'll look again) that there wasn't a clear=20

Would you be able to extend that to look for the DKIM_FAILURE or
SPF_(HARD|SOFT) fail SA headers?
_________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(tm). 
For Information please see http://www.spammertrap.com
_________________________________________________________________________