Re: [Alsa-user] question about upgrading to 1.0.0pre* vs other sound software
Brought to you by:
perex
From: wwp <sub...@fr...> - 2003-11-23 11:45:32
|
Hi Jaroslav Kysela, On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 12:32:38 +0100 (CET) Jaroslav Kysela <pe...@su...> wrote: > On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, wwp wrote: > > > is it necessary to recompiled sound-related stuff like esound, or xmms > > when upgrading to ALSA 1.0.0pre? Or does 1.0.0 breaks 0.9.0 library/headers > > compat? > > The binary compatibility is kept (so if you have compiled binaries against > old library, they will work ok with 1.0 library). But: you cannot compile > old (0.9) ALSA sources with 1.0 libraries. You must add these defines to > source: > > #define ALSA_PCM_OLD_HW_PARAMS_API > #define ALSA_PCM_OLD_SW_PARAMS_API > #include <alsa/asoundlib.h> Okay! Thanx for the clear and concise answer :-). Regards, -- wwp |