From: Peter H. <pet...@gm...> - 2008-02-28 23:04:14
|
Patch attached. Pete On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Trent Gamblin <tr...@ga...> wrote: > On Tue, February 26, 2008 2:26 pm, Peter Hull said: > [snip] > > > As far as I can see, there are two problems: > > 1. If the target is memory, it should call the generic function, not > > the display driver > > 2. If the bitmaps are from incompatible displays, it should fall > > back > > to using a memory-to-display blit, not do nothing. > > > > Is this correct? I can make a patch if so. Otherwise I've understood > > it wrong, sorry! > > > > Pete > > > I think you're right. The display driver memory blit is supposed to > draw memory bitmaps to the target, but if the target is a memory > bitmap, it can be done by the generic function. And as for 2, yes, > it should fall back on the generic function I would think. > > Trent > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > -- > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alleg-developers > |