Re: [AL] Documentation patch proposed

[Arthur H. <art...@fr...>]

On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:37:20 +0200
Elias Pschernig <el...@us...> wrote:

> I guess it actually
> is hard to understand - but so is your version. Both are clear when
> thinking a bit about it.

I am sorry to insist a bit but it's more than just hard to understand : it's bad because it does not make a difference between inclusive and exclusive.
This example would be valid in either case, since in either case, you can't just draw on 15/15 and 33/33 !
That is what anyone (but you ?) would consider a bad example.
 
I prefer my version because it clearly tells the difference between inclusive and exclusive, which I remind is all about being able to draw onto 16/16 and 32/32.

If you admit that both examples are unclear, then they have to be removed ! 

-- 
Greetings, 
A.H.