From: Grzegorz A. H. <gr...@te...> - 2001-10-28 18:07:21
|
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 02:27:35PM +0100, Lo'oRiS il Kabukimono wrote: > that's because if u use fbcon u can't change resolution without > rebooting... (Angelo told me) This is valid only for the vesa framebuffer (and maybe some other strange video card). -- Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz gr...@te... http://gradha.infierno.org/ >From <all...@ca...> Sun Oct 28 10:08:11 2001 Received: from pedos.es [212.170.192.248] by canvaslink.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.00) id AF568CBE0116; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 10:08:06 -0500 Received: from gregorio by pedos.es with local (Exim 3.12 #5 (Mega-Debian)) id 15xrTs-0002Sw-00 for <al...@ca...>; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 16:04:08 +0100 Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 16:04:08 +0100 From: Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz <gr...@te...> To: al...@ca... Message-ID: <200...@pe...> Mail-Followup-To: al...@ca... References: <200...@ga...n> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200...@ga...n>; from xa...@lo... on Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 01:23:36PM +0100 Subject: Re: [AL] Linux and set_gfx_mode Precedence: bulk Sender: all...@ca... Reply-To: al...@ca... X-UIDL: 304633511 Status: O Content-Length: 317 Lines: 7 On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 01:23:36PM +0100, Xarvh wrote: > Why ALLEGRO tells me that i have requested an invalid mode, while it > should say that fbcon cannot set that resolution? Most surely because you weren't using the GFX_FBCON driver. -- Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz gr...@te... http://gradha.infierno.org/ >From <all...@ca...> Sun Oct 28 19:13:59 2001 Received: from sm14.texas.rr.com [24.93.35.41] by canvaslink.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.00) id AF4296FB0116; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 19:13:54 -0500 Received: from bana (cs6669241-48.austin.rr.com [66.69.241.48]) by sm14.texas.rr.com (8.12.0.Beta16/8.12.0.Beta16) with SMTP id f9T0KsWt031234 for <al...@ca...>; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 18:20:54 -0600 Message-ID: <005f01c1600e$21cbfd70$0200a8c0@bana> From: "Jason" <tux...@au...> To: <al...@ca...> References: <001101c15dc1$4c450eb0$0200a8c0@bana> <3BD...@vi...> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 18:10:35 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 Subject: Re: [AL] liballeg.h problem Precedence: bulk Sender: all...@ca... Reply-To: al...@ca... X-UIDL: 304633512 Status: O Content-Length: 1242 Lines: 47 Nm... I did have an older version of allegro but I have the whole thing working now.. Thx for the help everyone. bana-sea- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob" <oha...@vi...> To: <al...@ca...> Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:47 PM Subject: Re: [AL] liballeg.h problem > Jason wrote: > > > Hello, > > > Hi, > > > > I have looked through many of the mailing list archives (just joined) and > > have gotten farther than before on installing allegro with dev-c++ the > > problem that I see now is the liballeg.h file is having problem while making > > allegro. Here is what I have done so far: > > > Which version of Allegro do you have? Are you sure you followed *all* the > instructions? If you need step-by-step instructions, see this thread: > http://www.allegro.cc/ubb-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=10&t=000083 > > With the latest procedure on getting Allegro and Dev-C++ working together. > Note that both the instructions on the thread, and those in readme.mgw are > the same, but more detailed. > > [snip] > > > btw, it's liballeg.a, or allegro.h, but not liballeg.h ;) > > > -- > - Robert J Ohannessian > "Microsoft code is probably O(n^20)" (my CS prof) > http://pages.infinit.net/voidstar/ > |