Re: [AD] future.html on the website

[Evert G. <eg...@dd...>]

> complete compatibility layer doesn't seem technically worthwhile any
> longer,

Oh? Why and in what sense not?

> and mentioning the year 2002 and  
> AllegroPro in an article named "future"..). The roadmap on the wiki
> (currently down) has more accurate info on current and future
> development, and also can be easily updated. So, any objections to
> simply removing this "Future" page?

Not from me, no.

Evert