From: Thomas F. <tfj...@st...> - 2004-11-30 10:37:41
|
On November 30, 2004 02:32 am, Thomas Fjellstrom wrote: > On November 28, 2004 01:42 pm, Stepan Roh wrote: > > On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Elias Pschernig wrote: > > > One of the things making the current makedoc so complicated is that it > > > has to deal with all the output specifics while reading in the ._tx > > > file (instead of leaving it to the output generators). And I don't see > > > how the docs have any advantage from it. > > > > Header and footer can go, but front-page with big Allegro ASCII-logo and > > std_disclaimer should stay. > > Actually, my ._tx->.xml doesn't need a front-page tag. just put some > <para>s for that text right in the first section/chapter. > Some of the _tx formating is getting to me >:E o unterminated <li>s (makes it more difficult to properly parse) o those funky <endblock> tags should go. whos idea was that anyway? Just use the opener tag name ::) the <b> dt lists... going to be interesting to know what to do there. Maybe just edit the docs to use deffinition lists instead? something. Why are the @chapter and @section commands multi line? Should probably be changed to work like the @hnode command. easier to parse as well. -- Thomas Fjellstrom tfj...@st... http://strangesoft.net |