From: Peter W. <tj...@al...> - 2002-07-26 04:21:23
|
On 2002-07-25, Santa Claus <thi...@ho...> wrote: > As far as Allegro is concerned, I'm aware that a new file system is around > the corner, and Peter's argument is it will render these modifications > redundant. However, I do not believe this is the case. Allegro 5 will be > breaking backwards compatibility, so it would be a big undertaking to > convert a game to use Allegro 5. I don't know about anyone else, but I was thinking about Allegro 4.2. But it doesn't mean your patch is rejected already: it depends whether the other idea gets implemented, or even if it *can* get implemented whilst maintaining compatibility with the current interface. > Even if the patch doesn't get applied, note that there is a problem with > the existing CVS tree. In file.c, the following appears: > > #define OPEN_PERMS (S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IWGRP | S_IROTH | > S_IWOTH) > > There's no problem on DJGPP, but (my version of) MinGW only defines S_IRUSR > and S_IWUSR, so the build fails. I propose the following: Thanks. -- 王浩禎 |