Re: [Acx100-users] Re: Acx is dead?

[Felipe C. <fel...@gm...>]

I thought it was very stable until I moved to this longstay hotel and
acx plainly doesn't work with this router. ndiswrapper doesn't work
either.

What was the conclusion with my issue anyway?

On 3/25/06, Giuseppe Castagna <Giu...@en...> wrote:
> Kenney Phillis Jr wrote:
> > actually it's pretty much already 100% usable, and also there is a few
> > posts before that show the recent updates... the recent version i got
> > from approximately february gives me no issues with a 802.11g wireless
> > connection using encryption.
> >
> > the file,  acx-20060215.tar.bz2 , is pretty much everything you need, i=
t
> > handles soo much... the main
> > issue is the lack of a configuration dialogue system that makes the tas=
k
> > go easier.
> >
>
> Since it is so stable (I agree on that), would it be possible to submit i=
t for
> kernel inclusion (just out of curiosity, since I do not have the slightes=
t idea
> on how big is the gap for the current code to satisfy kernel requirements=
)?
>
> ---Beppe---
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting langua=
ge
> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webc=
ast
> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territor=
y!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&dat=
=3D121642
> _______________________________________________
> Acx100-users mailing list
> Acx...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acx100-users
>


--
Felipe Contreras