From: Denis V. <vd...@il...> - 2005-06-27 12:34:22
|
On Monday 27 June 2005 01:55, Markus Kolb wrote: > Hello, > > I am browsing the code at the moment to find something related to my > problem with the oops on acx_pci.o module removal. > > So I've browsed over this: > > > const u16 IO_ACX111[] = > { > 0x0000, /* IO_ACX_SOFT_RESET */ > > 0x0014, /* IO_ACX_SLV_MEM_ADDR */ > 0x0018, /* IO_ACX_SLV_MEM_DATA */ > 0x001c, /* IO_ACX_SLV_MEM_CTL */ > 0x0020, /* IO_ACX_SLV_END_CTL */ > > 0x0034, /* IO_ACX_FEMR */ > > 0x00b4, /* IO_ACX_INT_TRIG */ > 0x00d4, /* IO_ACX_IRQ_MASK */ > 0x00f0, /* IO_ACX_IRQ_STATUS_NON_DES */ /* we need NON_DES, not > NON_DES_MASK at 0xe0 */ > > > Is this last element ok? 0xf0 <=> 0xe0 ? Yes. It says we do want NON_DES, and not NON_DES_MASK which is 0xe0. Comment is there to prevent people from 'fixing' that :) -- vda |