From: Pavel M. <pa...@su...> - 2002-05-30 21:22:24
|
Hi! > My sense was that s4bios was a transitional thing, and in all ways inferior > to regular S4. For example, old versions of Windows supported S4bios but not > S4, whereas Win2k and XP support S4 and drop S4bios support. > > So yes it's defined in the spec, but do we *really* want to add support for > this musty, weird little feature? It may be slightly faster to resume, and if user already has S4bios partition, it is easier to set it up. Pavel -- Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt, details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html. |