From: Nate L. <na...@ro...> - 2004-11-12 22:57:45
|
Bruno Ducrot wrote: > On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 11:49:44AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: > >> Name (BT0I, Package (0x0D) >> { >> 0x01, >> 0x19C8, >> 0x19C8, >> 0x01, >> 0x39D0, >> 0x014A, >> 0xDC, >> 0x012C, >> 0x0294, >> "ANA", >> "110", >> "Lion", >> 0x00 >> }) >> >>Looking more carefully, it looks like commenting out just the last line >>("Acer") would suffice. Index 0xC is actually an integer (0x00) so this >>is what triggers the Integer conversion. I'm not sure how the >>conversion rules should be modified to take this into account. >> > > > I suggest to replace the last integer with a string like "Acer". Since > anyway BT0I is expected to be a package returned by a _BIF method, it > must be compatible with ACPI spec (look at 11.2.2.1). > I agree to test this, but I'd also like to see acpi-ca improved to handle this case with the stock ASL. -- Nate |