Re: [ACPI] Re: [Ipw2100-devel] [susp-resume] ipw2100 suspend patch for 0.54 (version 3)

[Luca C. <lu...@pc...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello Karol,

on 09/15/04 10:37, Karol Kozimor wrote:
> Append noresume. swsusp1 kicks in earlier than pmdisk.
this works indeed.

Now, my situation:
- - ASUS M6N with BIOS 0209A
- - kernel 2.6.9-rc2 with no other patches
- - quite all the possible modules for my machine loaded
- - Debian GNU/Linux experimental
- - Debian XFree86-4.3.0.dfsg.1-7 (using the native radeon driver)
- - Debian GNOME 2.7.92-1

I can *successfully* suspend/resume with the 2 calls (/proc or /sys),
directly from XFree86 and with all the modules loaded. As already
reported, the only difference is that with the /sys call, in suspending
I've always the machine which powers off, while with the /proc call I
should power off the machine by pressing 4-sec the power button.

Simple question: which should be the best method to use? /sys or /proc?

Another thing: why for the /sys call I should use 'append=noresume',
while I want to *resume*? I mean, it's not so clear...

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBSBgFVAp7Xm10JmkRAi8CAJ9mL0FRj3oGsvJRQ2hxaZ4ZFXSyiQCaA3Vo
ljpK7b0WuGf9VMa5Z2SjiD0=
=ONtH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----