From: Bruno D. <du...@po...> - 2004-02-12 21:20:01
|
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 03:56:41PM -0500, Martijn Pieters wrote: > Bruno Ducrot wrote: > >> 0x8A010000 > > > > ^^^^^^^^^^ > > I think that all of those > > values are broken, because > > they are stored in a little bit > > order. > > It should be in fact, at least for the that > > first package: > > > > 0x0708, > > 0x6AB3, > > 0x007D, > > 0x0090, > > 0xE020298A, > > 0x018A > > > >Also, I think the 0xE020298A is false. It should be > >0x0E20298A I guess. > > Not enough experience with hand disassembly, that is. That is me not > realizing that the bytes are in the other order. And that 0E is my typo. > > iasl just refuses to disassemble the SSDT table, maybe because > \_SB._PR.CPU0 should be declared an external? > > Martijn Don't know, I never had trouble for disassembling SSDT. Strange. Perhaps a bug in recent iasl ? Can you send me the raw SSDT btw? -- Bruno Ducrot -- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? -- Don't know. Don't care. |