Re: [ACPI] ACPI PCI IRQ routing code merged in acpi patch

[M. B. <ser...@ne...>]

On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 02:54, Dominik Brodowski wrote:=20
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 03:02:19AM -0400, S=E9rgio Monteiro Basto wrote:
> >  sorry i don't like this idea of =20
> > =20
> > "All pending items to the ACPI PCI IRQ routing code are merged in
> > acpi-20020709."
>=20
> This message on my personal web-site only states that _I_ _currently_ do =
not
> have any patch for ACPI-based PCI IRQ routing. This comment is only about
> _my_ PCI IRQ patches, and as soon as I can track down any new problem and
> write a patch to resolve it, this line will be removed. It has nothing to=
 do
> with "official"  status, patches written by Andy Grover or Paul S. Diefen=
baugh
> at Intel or by anyone else.
>=20
> > and you will have other difficulty that is integrated in official
> > kernel.
> >=20
> > PCI IRQ for example resolve me, one IRQ conflict with my sound card and
> > other devices but now I don't have any message of the IRQ assign to my
> > sound card.
> If you have any problem with the new ACPI PCI IRQ routing code, please
> send me a /proc/interrupts and a dmesg of a boot with ACPI PCI IRQ, and=20
> one with BIOS PCI IRQ routing.
like I wrote It had improve my modem.=20
>=20
> Dominik
>=20
Hi(gh)!
With no offense, I am just trying help the linux community, even this is
not my area of development, and as you can see I have serious
difficulties in write in English.
But since I bought a laptop to work on my project, I stop work on my
project and work for this, in my spear time.=20

OK! isn't true? that patch to IRQ routing have been integrated in acpi
pacth 20020709 and in 20020611 isn't?

I am not complaining that your patch working bad, no. What  i am trying
to tell is. When is out one patch for acpi, we (users) have some
problems, this problem are not related to acpi, you discover that are
relate with IRQ routing. ok! so you made patches (very good patches) for
IRQ routing.
but in other cases acpi works well without need IRQ routing patch (is my
case).
Definitely kernel 2.4.18 hasn't yet resolve all problems with IRQ
routing, so your patch can be a great improve to kernel 2.4.18 but (I
think that) have to be apply separately of acpi.
This is only my modest opinion.

S=E9rgiomb

PS: maybe now acpi-project should advise people to use the two patches
(acpi + pciirq.x.acpi24 )=20